Best 7 PPC Audit Tools for Wasted-Spend Detection: An Honest 2026 Review

Comparing the top 7 best PPC audit tools of 2026 includes 1. TrueClicks, 2. Adalysis, 3. Optmyzr, 4. Opteo, 5. Semrush Advertising Toolkit, 6. PPC.io, and 7. WordStream Google Ads Performance Grader.

TrueClicks and Adalysis are purpose-built account-health auditors; Optmyzr targets multi-channel agencies managing 10+ accounts; Opteo is the lowest-friction option for solo Google Ads managers; Semrush Advertising Toolkit is a competitor-intel layer rather than a true account-health auditor; PPC.io is a new AI-agent approach still in free beta; and WordStream’s Performance Grader is a free one-shot snapshot, not a continuous monitor.

Picking the wrong audit tool means missed wasted spend accumulates silently. A Google Ads account with poor negative keyword hygiene, conflicting keyword match types, and unchecked Quality Score gaps can bleed 20-30% of budget before a campaign manager notices. Each option below was evaluated on audit depth and check coverage, wasted-spend detection specifics, platform breadth, pricing transparency, and independent reviewer evidence.

TL;DR

1. TrueClicks: Best for agencies running multi-account audits on Google and Microsoft Ads daily.
2. Adalysis: Best for in-house PPC teams at $50K-$500K/mo spend wanting daily automated diagnostics.
3. Optmyzr: Best for mid-size to large agencies managing 10+ accounts across multiple ad channels.
4. Opteo: Best for solo PPC managers running Google Ads who need fast audit-to-action with minimal setup.
5. Semrush Advertising Toolkit: Best for teams already on Semrush Guru who want competitor PPC intel alongside SEO.
6. PPC.io: Best for agencies wanting to test an AI-native 15-minute audit report while it’s still free in beta.
7. WordStream Performance Grader: Best for a free one-shot account health snapshot or pre-sales client prospecting.

Side-by-Side Comparison

How We Chose These PPC Audit Tools?

Each tool was evaluated using Capterra, G2, and practitioner threads on r/PPC, r/GoogleAds, LinkedIn, and Quora discussions from in-house PPC managers and agency leads who named specific tools they’d tested. Pricing was verified directly from live product pages as of June 2026. Tools that could not be confirmed as having a standalone audit function (as opposed to pure ad management software) were excluded from the shortlist.

Two criteria carried the most weight for wasted-spend detection specifically: audit check coverage (how many distinct failure modes does the tool surface, and does it flag them with priority context?) and actionability of output (does the tool show you what to fix and make it easy to fix, or does it dump a data table and leave you to interpret it?).

For the full process (every source we use, what disqualifies a tool, our conflict-of-interest handling, and our corrections policy), read our research methodology and editorial policy .

Detailed Comparison

1. TrueClicks

Best for: Agencies running continuous Google and Microsoft Ads audits across many client accounts.

TrueClicks is a purpose-built PPC audit and monitoring platform covering Google Ads and Microsoft Advertising. Its 100+ best-practice check framework scores each account daily, making it the most audit-focused software on this list.

Snapshot

Fits When

You’re an agency managing 5-50+ client accounts and want daily scoring, bulk issue-fix workflows, and budget pacing visibility at the portfolio level, not just periodic manual audits.

Wrong Fit

You need multi-channel coverage beyond Google and Microsoft (Meta, LinkedIn, Amazon), or your agency has mixed-domain client teams that would hit the free-plan email-domain restriction.

What Sets It Apart

TrueClicks built the platform specifically for audit and monitoring rather than bolting audit onto a broader optimization tool. The account health score aggregates 100+ checks into a single number per account, and the bulk fix workflow lets you action flagged issues across campaigns in one pass rather than navigating account by account.

• Health score tracks daily, so performance drops are visible before they compound
• Budget pacing tracker gives spend-vs-plan visibility at the portfolio (“My accounts”) level
• Google Ads + Microsoft Ads coverage in a single interface at the Starter/Plus tier

Client Outcomes

A PPC Specialist at a Marketing and Advertising firm wrote on Capterra: “The account auditing feature quickly surfaces issues that would otherwise take hours to find manually, saving an enormous amount of time.” A Senior Search Specialist added: “It simplifies my daily routine, helps prevent errors, and allows me to spot issues quickly.” (Capterra )

Pricing Breakdown

TrueClicks uses a spend-based model (approximately 0.25% of ad spend) as of June 2026. A free tier covers accounts up to $50K/mo in combined ad spend.

Known Gaps

No Meta, LinkedIn, or Amazon Ads support. The free plan requires all users to share an email domain, which blocks agencies with mixed-domain client teams. Some older Capterra reviews flag that Microsoft Ads integration was incomplete (verify current status before committing). The platform has no autonomous fix capability: it flags issues, but every change still requires manual action.

Reviewer Signal

Love: Saves hours on manual account reviews Reviewers consistently cite the time saved spotting issues that would take hours manually. “The account auditing feature quickly surfaces issues that would otherwise take hours to find manually.” (Capterra )

• Multiple reviewers note the daily monitoring function catches errors before they become expensive problems

Complain: Free plan email-domain restriction and limited platform breadth Several agency reviewers flag that the free plan’s single-domain requirement doesn’t work for their client structure, and the Google/Microsoft-only scope is a hard stop for agencies running Meta or LinkedIn alongside search.

• No built-in autonomous fix: every flagged item still requires a human to execute the change

Editor’s Call

TrueClicks earns the top slot because audit depth is its only product, and the 100+ daily check framework is the most credible wasted-spend detection mechanism on this list for search-focused agencies.

2. Adalysis

Best for: In-house PPC teams at $50K-$500K/mo ad spend wanting daily automated account diagnostics.

Adalysis was built by PPC veterans Brad Geddes and Emmanuel Gad and has run daily automated account checks since 2013. It’s the strongest option for in-house teams who want systematic audit coverage without agency overhead.

Snapshot

Fits When

You’re an in-house PPC manager or small team spending $50K-$500K/mo on Google and Microsoft Ads and you want continuous diagnostics rather than quarterly manual audits. You want to configure custom alert rules on top of the 100+ built-in checks.

Wrong Fit

You manage campaigns on Meta, LinkedIn, or Amazon (Adalysis is Google and Microsoft Ads only). You need real-time intraday anomaly detection (the 24-hour dashboard refresh cycle won’t catch same-day budget burn events). You want a modern UI with current UX standards.

What Sets It Apart

Adalysis runs more than 100 daily automated checks: duplicate keywords, keyword conflicts, ad groups with no active ads, low Quality Score clusters, budget pacing, and negative keyword gaps are all surfaced automatically. The rule engine lets you build custom checks that trigger alerts when specific thresholds are crossed, which is rare in audit tools at this price tier.

• 30-45 day free trial with no credit card required, the most generous trial period in this comparison
• Unlimited Google Ads + Microsoft Ads accounts and unlimited users on every paid plan
• Statistical significance engine for ad copy testing baked into the same platform

Client Outcomes

A Full Stack Marketer wrote on Capterra: “Adalysis is the perfect balance of robust features and day to day usability.” A Marketing Manager noted: “The custom performance alerts are a really useful feature, as they can help you to identify and take action on performance issues quickly.” (Adalysis reviews )

Pricing Breakdown

Adalysis prices by monthly ad spend as of June 2026. All plans include unlimited accounts and unlimited users, which is a meaningful differentiator for in-house teams with multiple brand properties.

Known Gaps

The dashboard refreshes every 24 hours, which multiple Capterra reviewers flag as too slow for high-spend accounts where intraday spend anomalies matter. The interface is widely described as dated. No Meta, LinkedIn, or Amazon Ads support.

Reviewer Signal

Love: Depth of automated checks and the free trial length “Adalysis is the perfect balance of robust features and day to day usability.” (Capterra )

• The 30-45 day no-credit-card trial gets repeated praise for letting teams validate the tool properly before paying

Complain: 24-hour refresh and dated interface Multiple reviewers flag that for accounts spending $50K+/day, a daily dashboard update misses same-day waste events. The UI is functional but behind contemporary SaaS design standards.

• Custom rule configuration has a learning curve that requires some PPC experience to use well

Editor’s Call

Adalysis is the most credible in-house audit option at sub-$350/mo: the founder credentials, the 100+ daily checks, and the unlimited-users pricing make it a strong choice for teams with serious Google and Microsoft Ads volume.

3. Optmyzr

Best for: Mid-size to large agencies managing 10+ client accounts across multiple ad channels.

Optmyzr is a PPC management and audit platform covering Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, and Amazon Ads. Its multi-channel reach and white-label reporting make it the most agency-scale option on this list.

Snapshot

Fits When

You’re a PPC agency managing 10+ client accounts across Google, Microsoft, Meta, LinkedIn, or Amazon Ads and you need a single audit + reporting layer with white-label output for client-facing delivery.

Wrong Fit

You’re a solo manager or small in-house team: the pricing model and feature depth are overkill, and the steeper learning curve will slow you down relative to Opteo or Adalysis. You need a flat monthly price without interacting with a spend slider.

What Sets It Apart

Optmyzr’s PPC Audit report scores each account against best practices across structure, bidding, quality, and wasted spend. Its rule-based automation layer lets agencies set custom triggers (alert when CPA exceeds $X, pause when budget hits Y%) and share negative keyword lists across all client accounts from a single control. The five-platform coverage is unique at this price tier.

• Cross-account shared negative keyword libraries cut waste management overhead for agencies
• Rule-based triggers can automate repetitive audit responses rather than requiring manual action each time
• Annual prepay saves approximately 30%, which is material at agency scale

Client Outcomes

A Senior Performance Marketing Manager at Capterra wrote: “It gives a clear, consolidated view of spend, revenue, and ROAS, which makes decision-making much easier.” A VP of Online Advertising added: “Worth the cost for the automated reporting alone.” (Capterra )

Pricing Breakdown

Optmyzr uses a spend-based slider model as of June 2026. The exact dollar entry is not stated flatly on the pricing page without interacting with the slider. Third-party sources cite approximately $208/mo for the Essentials tier starting at $25K/mo managed spend, but this is unconfirmed from Optmyzr’s own page.

Known Gaps

Pricing is opaque without using the spend slider, which makes budgeting harder. The Essentials tier locks out some audit features that only unlock on Premium or Enterprise. The learning curve is steeper than Opteo for teams wanting fast audit-to-action without rule configuration overhead.

Reviewer Signal

Love: Consolidated multi-platform view and the reporting automation “It gives a clear, consolidated view of spend, revenue, and ROAS, which makes decision-making much easier.” (Capterra )

• Agency-scale white-label reporting is frequently cited as a standalone reason to stay on the platform

Complain: Pricing opacity and Essentials feature gating Several reviewers flag frustration that meaningful audit features are locked behind the Premium tier, and the slider-based pricing makes forecasting costs for a growing account roster difficult.

• Setup and rule configuration take meaningful time before the platform pays off for smaller agencies

Editor’s Call

Optmyzr is the right choice when platform breadth and agency-scale automation matter more than audit simplicity. For a solo manager or an in-house team, the added complexity isn’t worth it.

4. Opteo

Best for: Solo PPC managers running Google Ads accounts who want the fastest audit-to-action workflow.

Opteo is a Google Ads optimization tool with a clean Scorecard for account health and an “Improvements” feed that surfaces prioritized fixes. It has the highest Capterra rating in this comparison (4.9/5 from 114 reviews) and the most frictionless UX.

Snapshot

Fits When

You’re a solo PPC manager or small in-house team managing Google Ads accounts up to $250K/mo who wants a quick account health score and a prioritized list of specific fixes to action without configuring rules or learning a complex platform.

Wrong Fit

You run Microsoft Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or Amazon Ads alongside Google. You manage more than 75 accounts. You want autonomous campaign changes rather than a tool that surfaces recommendations for manual approval.

What Sets It Apart

Opteo’s UX prioritization is what separates it from the rest of this list. The Scorecard gives an immediate health grade; the Improvements feed ranks specific fixes by impact and presents each as a card with a one-click apply or manual approval option. It’s designed to reduce the gap between “I know there’s something wrong” and “I fixed it” to the shortest possible workflow.

• 4.9/5 on Capterra from 114 reviews is the highest verified rating in this roundup
• One-click or manual approval for each improvement keeps the manager in control without friction
• Monitors account performance and surfaces new issues as they appear, not just on a fixed daily cycle

Client Outcomes

A Digital Strategy Manager wrote on Capterra: “Opteo makes it exceptionally simple for advertisers with a lot on their plate to manage what would normally be arduous tasks in a fraction of the time.” A Co-founder noted: “The customer support is next to none.” (Capterra )

Pricing Breakdown

Opteo prices by number of accounts and monthly ad spend as of June 2026. All plans include access to the Scorecard, Improvements feed, A/B testing, and monitoring.

Known Gaps

Google Ads only: no Microsoft Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or Amazon coverage. Every recommendation requires manual review and approval; Opteo doesn’t apply changes autonomously. Not suitable for agencies managing 75+ accounts. There’s no rule engine to configure custom audit checks beyond Opteo’s built-in set.

Reviewer Signal

Love: Speed and simplicity of the audit-to-action loop “Opteo makes it exceptionally simple for advertisers with a lot on their plate to manage what would normally be arduous tasks in a fraction of the time.” (Capterra )

• Customer support response speed is cited repeatedly as a differentiator for a tool at this price point

Complain: Google-only scope is a hard stop for multi-channel managers The single biggest complaint across reviews is the lack of Microsoft Ads and other channel support. Several reviewers note they’d switch to a multi-platform tool if Opteo added them.

• No autonomous changes: every fix requires a human step, which adds time for high-volume accounts

Editor’s Call

Opteo’s rating is the highest in this set and the UX delivers on it. The Google-only scope is a genuine constraint, but for teams living in Google Ads, it’s the cleanest path from “what’s broken” to “it’s fixed.”

Want a side-by-side? See the best Opteo alternatives .

5. Semrush Advertising Toolkit

Best for: Teams already on Semrush Guru who want competitor PPC intel and keyword gap analysis, not internal account health auditing.

Semrush Advertising Toolkit is a competitor-intelligence module inside the Semrush platform. It’s included here because it appears frequently in “PPC audit tools” searches, but the honest framing is that it audits competitor accounts from the outside, not your own account from the inside.

Snapshot

Fits When

You’re already paying for Semrush Guru ($249/mo) for SEO and want to add competitor PPC keyword gap analysis and historical ad copy benchmarking without a separate tool subscription.

Wrong Fit

You want to audit your own Google Ads account for Quality Score issues, wasted spend in your own search term reports, or negative keyword gaps from your own data. The Advertising Toolkit does not connect to your Google Ads account and does not surface internal account health issues.

What Sets It Apart

The Advertising History database goes back to 2012, which is useful for competitive creative benchmarking. The keyword gap tool surfaces terms competitors bid on that you don’t, with CPC and volume context. AdClarity (on the Pro tier) adds display, video, and social creative tracking. These are legitimate research utilities, but they’re competitor-intel tools, not account-health auditors.

• Historical ad copy library dating to 2012 is useful for copy benchmarking and creative testing strategy
• Keyword gap analysis surfaces missed bidding opportunities from competitor data
• Unified SEO + PPC view is useful for teams already doing both in Semrush

Client Outcomes

Semrush has 4.5/5 on G2 from 3,434+ reviews as a platform. No reviews are specific to the Advertising Toolkit alone. The platform-wide rating is a reasonable signal for tool stability and support quality, but it doesn’t confirm audit-specific satisfaction.

Pricing Breakdown

The Advertising Toolkit requires an existing Semrush subscription as of June 2026. The Guru plan ($249/mo) is the minimum to unlock the full toolkit. The Advertising Toolkit base module adds $99/mo; AdClarity Pro adds $200/mo.

Known Gaps

This tool does not connect to your Google Ads account. It cannot detect your own wasted spend, negative keyword gaps in your own account, Quality Score issues, or bid inefficiencies. It requires a Semrush Guru subscription as a prerequisite, which adds $249/mo before the toolkit cost. The Semrush platform Trustpilot score is 2.1/5 from 1,222 reviews, largely driven by billing disputes rather than product failures, but worth noting for teams sensitive to billing practices.

Reviewer Signal

Love: One platform for SEO and PPC competitive research Capterra reviewers who use Semrush for SEO appreciate that Advertising Toolkit lets them extend the workflow to PPC competitor research without a separate login. (Capterra )

• Historical ad copy archive is specifically valued by teams doing creative strategy or copy audits for competitive positioning

Complain: Not an account health auditor and expensive prerequisite Multiple practitioners on r/PPC note that Semrush Advertising Toolkit doesn’t replace dedicated audit tools because it can’t surface your own account’s issues. The Guru prerequisite makes it expensive if PPC research is the primary use case.

• Platform-level billing complaints on Trustpilot (2.1/5) are a recurring theme in practitioner discussions

Editor’s Call

It’s a legitimate competitor-intel tool inside a great SEO platform. It’s not a PPC audit tool in the wasted-spend detection sense. If that’s your need, go to TrueClicks, Adalysis, or Opteo.

6. PPC.io

Best for: Agencies wanting to test an AI-native full-account audit in about 15 minutes while it’s still free in beta.

PPC.io is an AI-agent audit platform for Google Ads, launched in 2025 and still in free beta as of June 2026. It uses specialized AI agents for distinct audit areas rather than a single scan, covering negative keyword gaps, landing page quality, ad copy, and competitive intelligence.

Snapshot

Fits When

You want to run a fast (~15-minute) full account audit for a client onboarding or prospect discovery call, you’re comfortable using beta software, and you want to evaluate the AI-native audit approach at no cost before deciding whether to pay post-beta.

Wrong Fit

You need verified track record, stable pricing, or Microsoft Ads support. You’re a risk-averse enterprise team that can’t use beta tooling. You run high-volume audits monthly: the credit-based post-beta model could get expensive at scale.

What Sets It Apart

PPC.io uses distinct AI agents for each audit domain rather than a single pass: the Account Auditor, Negative Keyword Finder (using N-gram pattern recognition on your search terms reports), Landing Page Analyzer, Ad Copy Analyst, Competitive Intelligence Agent, and Weekly Audit Agent are all separate tools that can be run independently. The read-only API access means no changes are applied without user approval.

• Full account audit reportedly completes in ~15 minutes vs typical 4-6 hours for manual review
• Negative Keyword Finder uses N-gram pattern recognition on your own search term data, not just generic suggestions
• Free during beta with no credit card required, a low commitment to evaluate the approach

Client Outcomes

There are no verified user ratings on G2, Capterra, or Clutch as of June 2026. PPC.io is in beta and the review record doesn’t exist yet. The tool has attracted attention from practitioners on r/PPC based on the speed claim and the AI-agent architecture, but this is unverified in the dossier.

Pricing Breakdown

PPC.io is free during beta as of June 2026. Post-beta pricing has been announced but is subject to change before the product exits beta.

Known Gaps

No verified ratings exist. Beta software carries feature instability risk. The planned credit-based model creates unpredictable cost scaling for agencies running high-volume monthly audits. Google Ads only, no Microsoft Ads coverage. No published client results or case studies.

Reviewer Signal

Love: Speed of a full audit and the free beta access Practitioners on r/PPC note the 15-minute audit claim and free access make it worth testing during beta. (PPC.io )

• The N-gram negative keyword finder is specifically called out as a useful specialized agent for search term hygiene

Complain: No review track record and beta risk There are no verified Capterra, G2, or Clutch reviews. Any team adopting PPC.io for client work before it exits beta is taking an unsupported risk on tool stability.

• Credit-based post-beta pricing model is flagged as a potential cost issue for high-volume agencies

Editor’s Call

PPC.io is worth testing for free while the beta window is open. Don’t depend on it for live client commitments yet. No verified reviews means no basis for a reliability judgment.

7. WordStream Google Ads Performance Grader

Best for: A free, one-shot Google Ads health snapshot or pre-sales client prospecting by an agency.

WordStream’s Google Ads Performance Grader has been available since around 2011. It grades your account across 10 metrics in under 60 seconds and produces a report with per-metric scores and industry benchmarks. It’s the only completely free option here that doesn’t require a subscription.

Snapshot

Fits When

You want a fast account health check without a software subscription. You’re an agency using it for prospect discovery (run the grader on a prospect’s account to show them where they’re losing spend before a sales call).

Wrong Fit

You need continuous monitoring, daily checks, or actionable fix workflows beyond a downloadable PDF report. You manage Microsoft Ads or other platforms. You want a tool that doesn’t funnel your data toward a managed services pitch.

What Sets It Apart

The grader covers 10 specific areas: wasted spend (negative keyword gaps), Quality Score vs industry benchmarks, impression share, CTR, account activity frequency, ad extensions, landing page quality, mobile readiness, display, and shopping. It benchmarks your results against industry averages rather than just showing raw numbers, which gives PPC managers a fast “how do we compare?” read.

• Covers 10 distinct audit dimensions in a single report completed in under 60 seconds
• Industry benchmarking context makes it useful for framing client conversations, not just internal diagnostics
• Performance Tracker auto-repeats every 30 days to show trend over time

Client Outcomes

There are no independent review ratings for the free Grader tool specifically. WordStream as a broader platform has been validated by millions of Google Ads users since 2007, but no reviewers specifically rate the Grader in isolation on G2 or Capterra.

Pricing Breakdown

The WordStream Performance Grader is free as of June 2026. No subscription, no payment details, and no WordStream account required, only Google Ads OAuth sign-in to read your account data.

Known Gaps

One-shot or periodic snapshot only: there’s no continuous monitoring, no automated fix workflow, and no Microsoft Ads coverage. Sharing Google Ads OAuth access with WordStream/LOCALiQ means your account data is accessible to a company whose primary business is selling managed PPC services. The free report is explicitly designed to funnel users toward LOCALiQ’s paid management offering. There are no independent reviewer quotes available for this tool.

Reviewer Signal

Love: Genuinely free and quick to run The tool’s primary appeal is zero cost and sub-60-second runtime. Agency practitioners use it as a prospect diagnostic tool to frame a discovery call.

• The 10-dimension benchmark output is actionable enough to start a conversation about what to fix

Complain: Lead-generation framing and no continuous monitoring The most common practitioner complaint is that the free report is a LOCALiQ lead-gen tool, not a neutral diagnostic. Several r/PPC users flag that they wouldn’t use it for any account they actually manage.

• Google Ads OAuth requirement means WordStream reads your account data, which not all teams are comfortable sharing

Editor’s Call

It’s a legitimate free snapshot tool. Use it when you need a quick benchmark or a prospect conversation starter. Don’t use it as a substitute for continuous monitoring.

FAQs

What is a PPC audit tool?

A PPC audit tool scans your Google Ads or Microsoft Ads account for structural issues, wasted spend, and best-practice gaps. It surfaces problems (missing negatives, conflicting keywords, low Quality Scores) so you can fix them before budget loss compounds.

How often should you run a PPC account audit?

For accounts spending $10K+/mo, continuous monitoring (daily checks via TrueClicks or Adalysis) is more reliable than quarterly manual audits. High-spend accounts can accumulate meaningful wasted budget within days of a structural problem going undetected.

Is WordStream’s Performance Grader actually free?

Yes. It requires only Google Ads OAuth sign-in and produces a report in under 60 seconds at no cost. The catch is that it’s a LOCALiQ lead-generation tool: the free report is designed to surface enough problems to prompt a managed-services sales conversation.

Does Semrush audit your own Google Ads account?

No. The Semrush Advertising Toolkit analyzes competitor accounts from the outside using Semrush’s crawled data. It does not connect to your Google Ads account and cannot surface your own Quality Score issues, negative keyword gaps from your search term reports, or internal wasted spend.

What’s the difference between a PPC audit tool and a PPC management platform?

An audit tool diagnoses your account: it surfaces issues, scores health, and recommends fixes. A PPC management platform handles execution: bidding, budget pacing, campaign creation. Some tools like Optmyzr and Adalysis do both; pure auditors like TrueClicks focus on the diagnostic layer only.

Can a B2B SaaS team get a free PPC audit without buying software?

Yes. PipeRocket Digital’s free PPC audit , part of its managed B2B SaaS PPC service, produces a prioritized finding list and pipeline framing before any retainer commitment. WordStream’s Grader is also free but is a one-shot snapshot rather than a structured expert review.

How do I pick between TrueClicks and Adalysis?

TrueClicks is stronger for agencies managing multiple client accounts (portfolio-level health score, budget pacing across accounts, bulk fix workflow). Adalysis is stronger for in-house teams on a single brand wanting deeper custom alert rules and statistical ad testing alongside daily checks. Both cover Google and Microsoft Ads at comparable price tiers.

Update History

• June 24, 2026: Published.

Sabarish Chandrasekar PPC Lead, PipeRocket Digital

Sabarish is a paid media lead focused on building high-performance acquisition programmes for B2B SaaS companies. As PPC Lead at PipeRocket Digital, he architects and scales Google Ads and LinkedIn Ads campaigns that drive qualified pipeline — bringing a data-first approach to every dollar of ad spend.

View full profile