9 Best SEOptimer Alternatives in 2026 (Compared)

Comparing the top 9 best SEOptimer alternatives for 2026 includes 1. SE Ranking, 2. AgencyAnalytics, 3. Sitechecker, 4. WooRank, 5. Screaming Frog SEO Spider, 6. Sitebulb, 7. Search Atlas, 8. Moz Pro, 9. Ubersuggest.

SE Ranking and Search Atlas suit agencies that want a full SEO platform instead of a single-purpose audit tool; AgencyAnalytics and Sitechecker target agencies whose real complaint is client-reporting quality or managing 10+ client sites at scale; WooRank stays in the same audit-widget niche SEOptimer occupies; Screaming Frog and Sitebulb serve technical SEOs who need deeper crawl data than an audit tool provides; Moz Pro fits teams that want brand recognition and a familiar authority metric; and Ubersuggest works for solo operators who want the lowest possible entry price.

Picking the wrong tool after leaving SEOptimer means paying 3x more for a full platform you don’t need, or trading its white-label report widget for a desktop crawler with no client-facing output at all. Each tool below was evaluated on pricing transparency, review credibility on Capterra and G2, and how directly it answers the two most-cited reasons buyers outgrow SEOptimer: a shallow keyword and backlink database, and a reporting layer that doesn’t scale past a handful of clients.

TL;DR

1. SE Ranking: Best for agencies that want a full SEO platform with rank tracking and white-label reporting instead of a single-purpose audit tool.
2. AgencyAnalytics: Best for agencies whose real complaint about SEOptimer is client-facing report design, not audit depth.
3. Sitechecker: Best for agencies managing 10+ client sites that also want AI-search-visibility tracking alongside technical audits.
4. WooRank: Best for teams that want the closest like-for-like swap in the same instant-audit-widget niche.
5. Screaming Frog SEO Spider: Best for technical SEOs who need the deepest crawl data and don’t need a client-facing report widget.
6. Sitebulb: Best for teams that want visual, hint-driven crawl reports with genuine white-label PDF export.
7. Search Atlas: Best for agencies consolidating several point tools into one AI-driven SEO platform.
8. Moz Pro: Best for teams that want brand recognition and the long-standing Domain Authority metric.
9. Ubersuggest: Best for solo operators and budget-conscious teams who want the cheapest possible swap.

Top 9 SEOptimer Alternatives at a Glance

How We Chose These Tools?

Each tool was evaluated using Capterra review pages, vendor pricing pages, and homepage case-study logos, cross-checked against secondary sources since SEOptimer’s own site and several vendor G2 pages consistently blocked direct automated fetches during this research pass. Every rating below except WooRank’s was confirmed directly on Capterra on August 12, 2026. Where a rating is vendor-self-reported rather than independently confirmed (WooRank), that’s flagged in the card below rather than presented as a settled number.

The two factors that mattered most for this category: pricing transparency against SEOptimer’s $29/mo entry point, since most genuine upgrades cost 3x or more, and scope fit, since SEOptimer is an audit-and-white-label-report tool rather than a full keyword or backlink research platform, and several alternatives here (Screaming Frog, Sitebulb, AgencyAnalytics) solve only one piece of what a full platform like SE Ranking or Search Atlas covers.

For the full process (every source we use, what disqualifies a tool, our conflict-of-interest handling, and our corrections policy) read our research methodology and editorial policy .

Detailed Comparison

1. SE Ranking

Best for: Agencies that want a full SEO platform with rank tracking and white-label reporting instead of a single-purpose audit tool.

SE Ranking , founded in 2013, pairs rank tracking, site audits, keyword research, and white-label reporting under one login, a much wider scope than SEOptimer’s audit-only focus.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for agencies that have outgrown SEOptimer’s audit-only scope and want rank tracking, keyword research, and reporting in one subscription, evidenced by named case studies like Fractional Teams and EYClick.

It’s NOT for teams that want SEOptimer’s $29/mo entry price; Core starts at $103.20/mo annual, more than 3x SEOptimer’s rate for a materially wider feature set.

Core Strengths

SE Ranking’s Agency Pack, AI Search Toolkit, and API Access add-ons let agencies scale reporting well past what SEOptimer’s audit-and-widget model supports.

• Named case studies span the UK, Spain, Germany, and France (EYClick, hurra.com, Cardeseo)
• 14-day free trial with no credit card required before committing
• AI Search Toolkit add-on tracks AI-search visibility, a gap SEOptimer doesn’t cover

Proof Point

Ben J., an SEO Director in marketing and advertising, wrote: “They are always providing new solutions to ensure we’re able to monitor visibility in a variety of search platforms at a great value for money.” (Source: Capterra .)

Limitation

Reviewers flag repeated price increases as the top complaint, and its keyword and backlink database still trails Semrush and Ahrefs at the deepest competitive-research tier.

Also evaluating Semrush? See our Semrush alternatives breakdown.

• Angus A., a director in broadcast media, cited “the significant price hikes in subscription costs that the platform has seen in the last 4 years” (Capterra)
• Database depth trails Semrush and Ahrefs for advanced competitive research

Editor’s read: We’d point agencies here first if the real problem with SEOptimer is scope, not price, since SE Ranking replaces the audit tool and adds rank tracking in one move.

Pricing

SE Ranking uses tiered subscription pricing. As of August 2026, Core runs $103.20/mo billed annually ($129/mo monthly), Growth $223.20/mo annually ($279/mo monthly), and Enterprise is custom-quoted, confirmed on seranking.com/subscription.html. Add-ons include Agency Pack ($69/mo), AI Search Toolkit ($71.20/mo), and API Access ($45/mo).

Considering SE Ranking on its own merits? See our SE Ranking alternatives roundup, or weigh it directly against Moz Pro in our neutral SE Ranking vs Moz breakdown.

2. AgencyAnalytics

Best for: Agencies whose real complaint about SEOptimer is client-facing report design, not audit depth.

AgencyAnalytics is an AI-powered client-reporting platform that automates reporting and centralizes data from 85+ sources, built to prove ROI and retention rather than run the underlying audit itself.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for agencies that already run an audit tool and want a stronger client-portal and reporting layer on top, since AgencyAnalytics pulls from 85+ integrations rather than doing crawl-level audits itself.

It’s NOT for teams that need SEOptimer’s core audit function replaced; AgencyAnalytics is a reporting and dashboard layer, not an SEO crawler, so it needs a separate audit tool alongside it.

Core Strengths

Its per-client pricing model scales predictably as an agency adds accounts, and AI insights plus MCP access (ChatGPT/Claude) come bundled into the Core plan rather than gated behind a higher tier.

• 85+ integrations pull data into one automated client-reporting dashboard
• Add-ons like Rank Tracker ($41.67/mo per 500 keywords) fill gaps a la carte
• 14-day free trial, no credit card required, to test the reporting workflow first

Proof Point

Feraud O., an agency owner in marketing and advertising, wrote: “This help cut down the time most client call to check in as we can show them real time stats in a easy to view way.” (Source: Capterra .)

Limitation

Report-cover customization is a documented weak spot, and buyers should budget for a separate audit tool since AgencyAnalytics doesn’t run its own site crawl.

• Sam M., a Director, called the report cover page “unbelievably ugly” with no customization options (Capterra)
• Needs a separate audit/crawl tool alongside it; it isn’t a full SEOptimer replacement on its own

Editor’s read: We’d recommend AgencyAnalytics specifically when the SEOptimer complaint is report polish, not audit depth, and pair it with a crawler for the audit side.

Pricing

AgencyAnalytics uses per-client subscription pricing. As of August 2026, Core runs $20/client/mo billed annually with unlimited staff and client users, add-ons like AI Tracker ($20.83/mo per 250 credits) and Rank Tracker ($41.67/mo per 500 keywords) cost extra, and Enterprise is custom for 25+ clients, confirmed on agencyanalytics.com/pricing. Note that pricing has shifted from an older per-seat model to this per-client structure.

Considering AgencyAnalytics on its own merits? See our AgencyAnalytics alternatives roundup.

3. Sitechecker

Best for: Agencies managing 10+ client sites that also want AI-search-visibility tracking alongside technical audits.

Sitechecker markets itself as “the SEO command center for agencies managing 10+ client sites,” combining rank tracking, technical audits, white-label branding, and an AI-visibility tracker across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for agencies running several client sites that want technical audits plus AI-visibility tracking in one dashboard, at $83/mo (Basic, annual) for 5 sites and 500 keywords.

It’s NOT for solo consultants on SEOptimer’s $29/mo tier; entry pricing here is roughly 3x SEOptimer’s rate for a materially deeper feature set.

Core Strengths

All plans include unlimited users, unlimited recrawls, and human support, a structure aimed squarely at agencies rather than individual site owners.

• AI-visibility tracker covers ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity out of the box
• Unlimited users and recrawls on every plan, including the entry tier
• 48-hour money-back guarantee lowers the risk of switching

Proof Point

Fabio L., an SEO consultant and data analyst, wrote: “The best SEO Tool with real data taken from GSC.” (Source: Capterra .)

Limitation

Reviewers flag pricing as steep for solo bloggers and small businesses, and advanced backlink analysis is gated to higher tiers.

• Entry price is over 3x SEOptimer’s $29/mo, a step up in cost as well as capability
• Advanced backlink analysis and Looker Studio integration require the Standard tier or higher

Editor’s read: We’d recommend Sitechecker to agencies that have genuinely outgrown a single-site audit tool, not to solo operators comparing on price alone.

Pricing

Sitechecker uses tiered subscription pricing. As of August 2026, Basic runs $99/mo ($83/mo annual) for 5 sites and 500 keywords, Standard $249/mo ($208/mo annual) for 15 sites and 2,500 keywords, Premium $449/mo ($375/mo annual) for 50 sites and 5,000 keywords, and Enterprise is custom, confirmed on sitechecker.pro/account/plans.

4. WooRank

Best for: Teams that want the closest like-for-like swap in the same instant-audit-widget niche as SEOptimer.

WooRank is a website-optimization and digital-agency sales tool built around an instant website review/audit widget, rank tracking, white-label reports, and a lead-gen tool for agencies, the single closest one-to-one competitor to SEOptimer in this roster.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for teams that want to stay in the exact same audit-widget-plus-white-label-report niche SEOptimer occupies, without moving to a full SEO platform.

It’s NOT for teams looking for a genuine upgrade in data depth; WooRank shares the same shallow-database ceiling SEOptimer has, so it’s a sideways move, not a step up.

Core Strengths

WooRank reports self-reported reach of 50 million websites analyzed, 250,000 monthly users, and operations across 107 countries, alongside a lead-gen widget agencies can embed on client-facing sites.

• Instant website review/audit widget mirrors SEOptimer’s own lead-gen model
• Self-reported reach: 50M+ websites analyzed, 250,000 monthly users
• API access available for agencies that want to embed audit data elsewhere

Proof Point

WooRank’s homepage displays logos from HubSpot, Salesforce, GoDaddy, Forbes, Search Engine Land, and Search Engine Journal, though these read as media and press mentions rather than confirmed case-study clients. No independently verified customer quote was available to confirm this session.

Limitation

Exact current pricing isn’t public on WooRank’s own pricing page, which is JS-rendered and didn’t return plan prices to static verification, and its data depth doesn’t meaningfully exceed SEOptimer’s.

• Pricing requires a live check on woorank.com; no flat figures confirmed
• Same shallow keyword and backlink database ceiling as SEOptimer itself

Editor’s read: We’d only recommend WooRank if the goal is switching vendors within the exact same audit-widget category, not upgrading data depth.

Pricing

WooRank has not published flat pricing on a static-fetchable page. As of August 2026, it’s historically marketed across Pro, Premium, and Custom tiers with a free trial; confirm current figures at woorank.com/en/p/pricing before purchase.

5. Screaming Frog SEO Spider

Best for: Technical SEOs who need the deepest crawl data and don’t need a client-facing report widget.

Screaming Frog SEO Spider is a desktop website crawler flagging 300+ SEO issues, built as “the industry leading website crawler for Windows, macOS and Linux,” and the highest-rated tool in this roster on the largest review sample (4.9/5 across 134 Capterra reviews).

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for technical SEOs and agencies that need the deepest crawl-level audit data (broken links, meta analysis, hreflang, structured data) and already have a separate reporting or client-communication tool.

It’s NOT for agencies that need SEOptimer’s white-label client reports or embeddable lead-gen widget; Screaming Frog has no built-in client-facing reporting layer at all.

Core Strengths

Its free version includes all core features up to a 500 URL crawl, and volume licensing drops to £169/license/yr at 20+ licenses, making it cheap to scale across a technical SEO team.

• Flags 300+ SEO issues per crawl, deeper than a single-site audit tool
• Free tier includes JS rendering, structured-data validation, and GA/GSC integration
• Volume discounts to £169/license/yr for teams of 20+

Proof Point

Aleyda Solis, Owner of Orainti, said: “The Screaming Frog SEO Spider is my ‘go to’ tool for initial SEO audits and quick validations: powerful, flexible and low-cost.” (Source: screamingfrog.co.uk .)

Limitation

It’s a desktop-only tool with no built-in white-label client reporting or embeddable audit widget, so it replaces SEOptimer’s crawl depth but not its lead-gen or report-delivery function.

• No client-facing report delivery or embeddable widget, unlike SEOptimer
• Capterra reviewers flag a dated UI and heavy resource use on large crawls

Editor’s read: We’d recommend Screaming Frog specifically for the crawl-data upgrade, paired with a separate tool for client-facing reports.

Pricing

Screaming Frog uses a free-plus-paid-license model. As of August 2026, the free version caps crawls at 500 URLs with all core features included, and the paid license runs £199/yr for unlimited crawling, dropping to £169/license/yr at 20+ licenses, confirmed on screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/pricing.

Considering Screaming Frog on its own merits? See our Screaming Frog alternatives roundup.

6. Sitebulb

Best for: Teams that want visual, hint-driven crawl reports with genuine white-label PDF export.

Sitebulb is a website crawler built to make technical SEO audits “easier, more efficient, accurate, and affordable,” available as desktop software or as Sitebulb Cloud for teams that want automated recurring crawls.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for freelance SEO consultants and agencies that want visually clear, white-label PDF reports built from real crawl data, not just an audit-widget summary.

It’s NOT for teams that want transparent desktop pricing before they trial; Sitebulb publishes a Cloud figure but not flat Desktop Lite or Desktop Pro prices, and its 25-review Capterra sample is the smallest in this roster.

Core Strengths

Desktop Pro supports up to 500,000 URLs per audit with 300+ hints and audit comparisons, while Sitebulb Cloud adds unlimited crawling and automated recurring audits for teams that want a hosted workflow.

• 300+ hints and audit comparisons in the Desktop Pro tier
• Custom PDF reports designed for direct client delivery
• 15% savings on yearly billing, plus a 14-day free trial

Proof Point

Jessica Thomas, a Freelance SEO Consultant, wrote: “Being able to easily export completely white-label PDFs and CSV reports for my clients for a fair price has saved me hours of work each week.” (Source: sitebulb.com/features .)

Limitation

Its 4.9/5 Capterra score rests on just 25 reviews, the thinnest sample in this roundup, and Cloud pricing scales quickly for larger teams, reportedly reaching £20k+/year at scale.

• Smallest review sample here (25 on Capterra) despite the high score
• Cloud pricing can reach £20k+/year for large teams, and Desktop tier prices aren’t published

Editor’s read: We’d recommend Sitebulb specifically for the white-label PDF quality, and suggest asking sales for a flat Desktop Lite or Pro figure before committing.

Pricing

Sitebulb sells Desktop Lite, Desktop Pro, and Sitebulb Cloud plans. As of August 2026, Cloud starts from £95/mo for 2+ users with unlimited crawling, scaling to £20k+/year for the largest teams; Desktop Lite and Pro prices aren’t shown on the static pricing page, so confirm exact figures at sitebulb.com/pricing before purchase.

Considering Sitebulb on its own merits? See our Sitebulb alternatives roundup.

7. Search Atlas

Best for: Agencies consolidating several point tools into one AI-driven SEO platform.

Search Atlas positions itself as “an AI marketing platform for search,” unifying SEO research, on-page optimization through its OTTO AI layer, content creation, paid search, local SEO, and AI-visibility tracking under one login.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for agencies already juggling 4-5 separate subscriptions who want a consolidation play spanning SEO, content, paid search, and AI-visibility tracking in one platform.

It’s NOT for solo operators or small teams; the Agency tier ($999/mo) is the highest entry price in this roster, and even Starter ($99/mo) is more than 3x SEOptimer’s rate.

Core Strengths

Named client logos on Search Atlas’s homepage include Autotrader, Vendasta, P&G, Shutterfly, Hyundai, and Zynga, suggesting real enterprise-scale usage of the platform.

• OTTO AI layer automates on-page optimization, a step beyond audit-only tools
• Named clients span automotive, ecommerce, and consumer brands (Autotrader, P&G, Hyundai)
• Free 30-minute onboarding session included with the trial

Proof Point

Zach C., an agency owner, wrote: “Search Atlas has given me and my small team the absolute confidence to not only scale our agency, but to compete against any larger agency.” (Source: Capterra .)

Limitation

Its Agency tier ($999/mo) is the highest entry price in this set, and OTTO’s automation-heavy approach is a much larger platform commitment than SEOptimer’s single-purpose audit tool.

• Highest top-tier price in this roster at $999/mo (Agency, 10 projects)
• Amber H., an owner, left after six months at the enterprise level citing billing errors, unreliable integrations, and features “restricted and repriced without notice” (Capterra)

Editor’s read: We’d recommend Search Atlas only to agencies actively trying to consolidate several tools, not as a direct SEOptimer swap on price.

Pricing

Search Atlas uses tiered subscription pricing. As of August 2026, Starter runs $99/mo (1 project, 1 seat), Growth $199/mo (2 projects, 3 seats), Pro $399/mo (4 projects, 5 seats), and Agency $999/mo (10 projects, 10 seats, white-label), all with a 7-day free trial, confirmed on searchatlas.com/pricing.

Considering Search Atlas on its own merits? See our Search Atlas alternatives roundup, or weigh it against Semrush in our neutral Search Atlas vs Semrush breakdown.

8. Moz Pro

Best for: Teams that want brand recognition and the long-standing Domain Authority metric alongside a fuller SEO platform.

Moz Pro is a full SEO platform anchored by the proprietary Domain Authority metric, keyword research, rank tracking, and link-building tools, one of the most recognized brand names in the category.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for teams that want an established, widely recognized SEO platform and the Domain Authority metric specifically, at $49/mo, well above SEOptimer’s $29/mo but for a materially wider platform.

It’s NOT for teams chasing the deepest data; Capterra reviewers flag data-accuracy complaints, and its core audit capability isn’t dramatically deeper than SEOptimer’s for the price jump.

Core Strengths

Moz’s long-established brand recognition and the Domain Authority metric give it a familiarity edge many buyers already trust before they even trial it.

• Long-established brand recognition in the SEO category
• Domain Authority metric is an industry-familiar shorthand many buyers already trust
• Keyword research, rank tracking, and link-building bundled under one plan

Proof Point

Claire B., a Web Content Manager in computer software, wrote: “Moz allows me to easily identify and prioritise keywords to create content for, track and improve rankings for existing content and monitor competition.” (Source: Capterra .)

Limitation

Reviewers cite data-accuracy complaints and billing or refund friction as recurring themes, and pricing sits meaningfully higher than SEOptimer’s for audit capability that isn’t dramatically deeper.

• Dave A., a marketing and advertising owner, described a billing dispute in a June 2026 review: “I then got charged for a package that doesn’t even exist $205/month and when I asked for a refund they said no” (Capterra)
• Pricing floor is well above SEOptimer’s for comparable core audit depth

Editor’s read: We’d recommend Moz Pro mainly for the brand recognition and Domain Authority metric, not as a dramatic data-depth upgrade over SEOptimer.

Pricing

Moz Pro uses tiered subscription pricing. As of August 2026, Starter runs $49/mo, Standard $99/mo, Medium $179/mo, and Large $299/mo, with a 7-day free trial that requires a credit card. These figures come from Capterra’s Moz Pro listing, since moz.com blocked direct verification during this pass, so confirm current figures at moz.com/products/pro before purchase.

Considering Moz Pro on its own merits? See our Moz Pro alternatives roundup.

9. Ubersuggest

Best for: Solo operators and budget-conscious teams who want the cheapest possible swap from SEOptimer.

Ubersuggest is a keyword research and basic site-audit tool from Neil Patel Digital, positioned as the lowest-cost entry point in this category, including a one-time lifetime-deal option that avoids a recurring subscription entirely.

Tool Snapshot

Fit Profile

It’s for solo operators and budget-conscious teams that want to match SEOptimer’s $29/mo entry price while adding keyword research on top of basic auditing.

It’s NOT for teams that need data they can build a content roadmap on with confidence; search-volume and keyword-difficulty data are frequently cited as inconsistent versus paid tools.

Core Strengths

The lifetime-deal option ($290/$490/$990) eliminates recurring subscription cost entirely, a genuinely distinctive pricing model not shared by any other tool in this roster.

• Lifetime-deal pricing removes recurring cost, unlike every other tool here
• Matches SEOptimer’s $29/mo entry price exactly at the Individual tier
• Keyword research bundled in at the same price SEOptimer charges for audits alone

Proof Point

Miguel G., a Senior Web Designer, wrote: “Ubersuggest is a great app to get started in SEO, the price is affordable and the data is quite accurate.” (Source: Capterra .)

Limitation

Search-volume and keyword-difficulty data are frequently cited as inconsistent versus paid tools, and its review sample here is smaller than most other tools in this roster.

• Data accuracy on search volume and keyword difficulty flagged as inconsistent
• Smaller review sample (93) than most other tools in this roundup

Editor’s read: We’d recommend Ubersuggest only when price parity with SEOptimer matters more than data confidence, and suggest cross-checking volumes elsewhere.

Pricing

Ubersuggest uses tiered subscription pricing plus a one-time lifetime-deal option. As of August 2026, Individual runs $29/mo (confirmed as the starting price on Capterra’s Ubersuggest listing), Business $49/mo, and Enterprise/Agency $99/mo, with lifetime-deal alternatives at $290, $490, and $990. Neil Patel’s own pricing page blocks automated verification, so confirm the higher tiers at neilpatel.com/ubersuggest before purchase.

Considering Ubersuggest on its own merits? See our Ubersuggest alternatives roundup.

Why Look for a SEOptimer Alternative?

The most cited reason teams look past SEOptimer is scope. It’s built around a single-site SEO audit and an embeddable audit widget for agency lead-gen, plus white-label PDF report delivery, not a keyword-research or backlink-index platform. Teams outgrow it when they need a real keyword and backlink database for competitive research, multi-client rank tracking at scale, a more modern and customizable white-label reporting layer, or AI-search-visibility tracking, none of which are SEOptimer’s core strength.

The second driver is scale. SEOptimer’s audit-and-widget model works well for a freelancer or small agency running a handful of client sites, but agencies managing 10+ accounts consistently look for a platform built around multi-client dashboards, deeper crawl limits, and reporting flexibility that SEOptimer’s report-design layer doesn’t stretch to cover.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best SEOptimer alternative?

SE Ranking is the strongest pick for agencies wanting a full platform with white-label reporting. AgencyAnalytics fits best if report design is the issue.

Is there a cheaper SEOptimer alternative?

No paid tool here undercuts SEOptimer’s $29/mo entry price, but Ubersuggest matches it at $29/mo and Screaming Frog offers a genuinely free version.

Which SEOptimer alternative has a free plan?

Screaming Frog offers a free version capped at 500 URLs, and Ubersuggest has a limited free tier. The rest offer a free trial instead of a free-forever plan.

Which alternative is best for agencies managing many client sites?

Sitechecker and AgencyAnalytics are both built around multi-client workflows, with Sitechecker adding technical audits and AgencyAnalytics focused on reporting.

Which alternative offers the deepest technical crawl data?

Screaming Frog SEO Spider and Sitebulb both go far deeper on technical crawl data than SEOptimer’s single-site audit tool.

Which alternative is closest to SEOptimer’s own audit-widget model?

WooRank is the closest like-for-like match, built around the same instant-audit-widget and white-label-report niche.

Does SEOptimer offer white-label reporting?

Yes. SEOptimer’s core pitch is white-label PDF report delivery alongside its single-site SEO audit tool and embeddable audit widget.

Update History

• August 12, 2026: Published. Sitebulb’s rating corrected from “Not rated” to 4.9/5 (25 reviews, Capterra), and Search Atlas’s rating switched from an unverifiable G2 figure to a directly confirmed Capterra figure of 4.7/5 (85 reviews).

Omar Sheriff SEO Specialist, PipeRocket Digital

Omar is an SEO specialist with experience driving organic growth for B2B SaaS companies. As SEO Specialist at PipeRocket Digital, he focuses on on-page optimisation, content strategy, and BOFU intent — building programmes that turn search visibility into qualified pipeline.

View full profile